SFR Invs. Pool 1 v. Bank of Am.

Full title: SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; DOES I…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 10, 2022

2:22-cv-01864-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 10, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01864-GMN-BNW

11-10-2022

SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; DOES I through X; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X, inclusive, Defendants.

AKERMAN LLP MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8215 SCOTT R. LACHMAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12016 Attorneys for Bank of America, N.A. HANKS LAW GROUP KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9578 CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8886 Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC

BRENDA WEKSLER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

AKERMAN LLP

MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8215

SCOTT R. LACHMAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12016

Attorneys for Bank of America, N.A.

HANKS LAW GROUP

KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9578

CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8886

Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

(FIRST REQUEST)

BRENDA WEKSLER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC and Bank of America, N.A. (BANA) stipulate that BANA shall have an additional seventeen (17) days, up to and including December 1, 2022, to file its response to the SFR's complaint, which is currently due on November 14, 2022 under rule 81. The complaint was filed on October 3, 2022, and removed to federal court on November 4, 2022.

Good cause exists to grant the requested extension. BANA requested the extension from SFR so that the parties could explore settlement options.

This is the parties' first request for an extension of this deadline, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.