Opinion
No. 64482 No. 65261
12-30-2014
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR REMAND AND DISMISSING APPEAL
The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss these consolidated appeals and remand these matters to the district court pursuant to Huneycutt v. Huneycutt, 94 Nev. 79, 575 P.2d 585 (1978); see also Foster v. Dingwall, 126 Nev. 49, 228 P.3d 453 (2010). The motion is accompanied by an order of the district court certifying that upon remand it is inclined to vacate its orders denying injunctive relief and granting the motion to dismiss and to "allow litigation to continue consistent with the holdings in the recent SFR opinion."
Cause appearing, we grant the joint motion. Accordingly, we remand these matters to the district court pursuant to its certification, and we order these consolidated appeals dismissed. This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant's right to file a motion to reinstate these consolidated appeals should the district court decline to grant the relief requested. Any such motion to reinstate these consolidated appeals shall be filed within 60 days of the district court's order declining to grant the requested relief. The parties' joint motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief is denied as moot.
We note that any aggrieved party may file a notice of appeal from any appealable order entered at the completion of the district court proceedings. See NRAP 3A.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
/s/_________, J.
Parraguirre
/s/_________, J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge
Howard Kim & Associates
Akerman LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk