From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SFR Invs. Pool 1, LLC v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nov 20, 2014
No. 64562 (Nev. Nov. 20, 2014)

Opinion

No. 64562

11-20-2014

SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., A NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF REVERSAL AND REMAND

This is an appeal from a district court order, certified as final under NRCP 54(b), granting a motion to dismiss in a quiet title action. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Ronald J. Israel, Judge.

The district court granted respondent's motion to dismiss, finding that appellant had failed to state a viable claim for relief because "NRS 116.3116(2) does not permit extinguishment of a deed of trust lien by virtue of a nonjudicial HOA sale when the notice of assessment lien giving rise to the HOA sale is recorded after recordation of the deed of trust lien." This court's recent disposition in SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. ___, 334 P.3d 408 (2014), decides that a common-interest community association's NRS 116.3116(2) superpriority lien has true priority over a first security interest, and the association may nonjudicially foreclose on that lien. The district court's decision thus was based on an erroneous interpretation of the controlling law and did not reach the other issues colorably asserted. Accordingly, we

REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.

/s/_________, J.

Pickering

/s/_________, J.

Saitta
PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring:

For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. ___, 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.

/s/_________, J.

Parraguirre
cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge

Howard Kim & Associates

Smith Larsen & Wixom

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

SFR Invs. Pool 1, LLC v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nov 20, 2014
No. 64562 (Nev. Nov. 20, 2014)
Case details for

SFR Invs. Pool 1, LLC v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 20, 2014

Citations

No. 64562 (Nev. Nov. 20, 2014)

Citing Cases

Wheelock v. Cavitt

The certificate of Jas. H. Griffin, the notary public, attached to the deed from appellant and her husband to…

Rio Grande Ry. Co. v. Armendiaz

This was not rescinding or setting aside the writing, and required no special pleadings. 1 Rice on Ev., 288;…