Opinion
2:22-CV-195 JCM (BNW)
12-19-2022
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, Plaintiff(s), v. NEWREZ LLC D/B/A SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING, Defendant(s).
ORDER
Presently before the court is Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler's report and recommendation (“R&R”). (ECF No. 111). She recommends that plaintiff's motion to amend by granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, she concludes that plaintiff should be granted leave to amend its wrongful foreclosure claim but denied leave to amend its quiet title claim. See (id.)
No objections were filed to the R&R. Thus, the court is not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the R&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“[T]he district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.” (emphasis in original)).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Judge Weksler's R&R (ECF No. 111) be, and the same hereby is, ADOPTED, in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to amend (ECF No. 40) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, consistent with that recommendation.