SFR Inv. Pool 1 v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n

Full title: SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 3, 2023

2:22-cv-01942-GMN-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 3, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01942-GMN-VCF

01-03-2023

SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; NEWREZ LLC DBA SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING; DOES I through X; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X, inclusive, Defendants.

ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8276 MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8215 PAIGE L. MAGASTER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15557 AKERMAN LLP Attorneys for Federal National Mortgage Association and Newrez LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing HANKS LAW GROUP KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9578 CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8886 Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC

Cam Ferenbach United States Magistrate Judge

ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8276 MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8215 PAIGE L. MAGASTER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15557 AKERMAN LLP Attorneys for Federal National Mortgage Association and Newrez LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing

HANKS LAW GROUP KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9578 CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8886 Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

(FOURTH REQUEST)

Cam Ferenbach United States Magistrate Judge

Defendants Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and NewRez LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing (Shellpoint) (collectively defendants), and plaintiff SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, hereby stipulate and agree that defendants shall have an additional thirty (30) days, up to and including February 2, 2023, to file their response to SFR's amended complaint. Defendants' responsive pleading is currently due on January 3, 2023.

Good cause exists to grant the requested extension. The parties are currently negotiating settlement in good faith in this case. The parties have resolved six substantially similar cases through settlement. SFR made a settlement offer to defendants on December 22, 2022. Defendants' response to SFR's offer remains pending, due in part to the intervening holidays. The parties request additional time so that defendants may respond to SFR's settlement offer and so that the parties can further negotiate settlement.

This is the parties' fourth stipulation for an extension of time for defendants to respond to SFR's amended complaint. The extension is requested in good faith and is not for purposes of delay or prejudice to any party.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.