SFR Inv. Pool 1 v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n

Full title: SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 9, 2022

2:22-cv-01942-GMN-VCF (D. Nev. Dec. 9, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01942-GMN-VCF

12-09-2022

SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; NEWREZ LLC DBA SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING; DOES I through X; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X, inclusive, Defendants.

Akerman LLP Paige L. Magaster ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ. PAIGE L. MAGASTER, ESQ. Attorneys for Federal National Mortgage Association and Newrez LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing Hanks Law Group KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC

Cam Ferenbach United States Magistrate Judge

Akerman LLP Paige L. Magaster ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ. PAIGE L. MAGASTER, ESQ. Attorneys for Federal National Mortgage Association and Newrez LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing

Hanks Law Group KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST)

Cam Ferenbach United States Magistrate Judge

Defendants Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and NewRez LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and plaintiff SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC hereby stipulate defendants shall have an additional ten (10) days, up to and including December 19, 2022, to file their response to SFR's amended complaint. Defendants' response is currently due December 9, 2022. This is the parties' second stipulation to extend the response deadline, initially set for November 25, 2022.

Good cause exists to grant the requested extension. Because Fannie Mae, which is under conservatorship with the Federal Finance Housing Agency (FHFA), is a named party in the litigation, filings on its behalf are subject to multiple levels of review, including review by the FHFA. The defendants require additional time so that they may fully respond to the allegations and claims in this action pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. These reasons demonstrate good cause for the court to grant the requested extension. The extension is requested in good faith and is not for purposes of delay or prejudice to any party.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.