From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seymour v. Dept. of Employment Security

Supreme Court of Vermont
Feb 14, 1979
399 A.2d 519 (Vt. 1979)

Summary

concluding good cause to leave existed following breach of agreement to provide transportation

Summary of this case from Demar v. Department of Labor

Opinion

No. 93-78

Opinion Filed February 14, 1979

Unemployment Compensation — Employment Termination — Waiver of Employer Misconduct

Where employer breached its agreement to provide employee with transportation to work sites, employee used his own auto and did not object to employer's refusal to transport during the four week period of his employment, and employee then gave a week's notice and quit, he did not waive the breach and could not on ground of waiver be denied unemployment compensation for leaving employment voluntarily without good cause attributable to employer. 21 V.S.A. § 1344.

Appeal from denial of unemployment compensation. Employment Security Board, Kerr, Chairman, presiding. Reversed and remanded.

Walter M. Morris, Jr., Vermont Legal Aid, Inc., St. Johnsbury, for Plaintiff.

Michael F. Ryan, Montpelier, for Defendant.

Present: Barney, C.J., Daley, Larrow, Billings and Hill, JJ.


The claimant, a youthful employee, was denied unemployment compensation on the ground that he left his employment voluntarily without good cause attributable to his employer. 21 V.S.A. § 1344(a)(2)(A).

The Board concluded that the employer, to the claimant's detriment, breached an agreement to provide transportation to work sites in New York. It further concluded, however, that the claimant had waived the breach by electing to use his own car and then by not objecting to the substantial change in the agreement during the four week period of his employment. We cannot agree and, accordingly, reverse.

By the employer's failure to provide transportation, the claimant was unreasonably placed in a position which rendered continued employment impossible. To insist that he waived good cause through a good faith effort to remain employed is to ignore the evidence of the employer's fault. The undisputed evidence shows that the claimant worked at various job sites in the State of New York, providing his own transportation for a period of four weeks. He gave his employer a week's notice of his intention to leave the job.

As in Wallace v. Department of Employment Security, 134 Vt. 513, 365 A.2d 517 (1976), where the claimant accepted unsuitable employment but did not remain in excess of a reasonable period of time, no waiver or forfeiture of unemployment benefits results. The Board's conclusions are inconsistent with the findings and not being supportable in law must be overturned. Shorey v. Department of Employment Security, 135 Vt. 414, 415, 377 A.2d 1389, 1390 (1977).

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for computation and award of benefits.


Summaries of

Seymour v. Dept. of Employment Security

Supreme Court of Vermont
Feb 14, 1979
399 A.2d 519 (Vt. 1979)

concluding good cause to leave existed following breach of agreement to provide transportation

Summary of this case from Demar v. Department of Labor

In Seymour v. Dept. of Employment Security, 137 Vt. 79, 399 A.2d 519 (Vt. 1979), the Vermont Department of Employment Security determined that, although the employer had breached an agreement to provide transportation to work sites, the employee had waived the breach by using his own car and by failing to object during the four weeks of his employment.

Summary of this case from Baker v. Fanny Farmer Candy Shops No. 154
Case details for

Seymour v. Dept. of Employment Security

Case Details

Full title:Gary J. Seymour v. Department of Employment Security

Court:Supreme Court of Vermont

Date published: Feb 14, 1979

Citations

399 A.2d 519 (Vt. 1979)
399 A.2d 519

Citing Cases

Stryszko v. Dept. of Employ. and Training

Absent such an agreement, the employer's failure to provide transportation does not constitute good cause…

Skudlarek v. Dept. of Employ. Training

She should not be penalized for her attempt to do so. See Seymour v. Department of Employment Sec., 137 Vt.…