From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seymour v. Cohen

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1872
67 N.C. 345 (N.C. 1872)

Opinion

June Term, 1872.

Where a motion is made by a party to set aside a judgment, notice must be given to the adverse party.

MOTION to set aside a judgment, heard before Clarke, J., at Chambers.

Faircloth for plaintiffs.

Busbee Busbee for defendants.


No notice was given by the defendant, against whom the judgment was rendered, to the plaintiff, of the motion to set aside and vacate the judgment. His Honor ordered the judgment to be vacated and that defendant be permitted to plead. From this order plaintiff appealed.


The only question necessary for us to consider, is, was notice to the adverse party of the motion to vacate the judgment, necessary. Notice was necessary, and the order vacating the judgment without notice was erroneous.

PER CURIAM. Reversed.

Cited: Sutton v. McMillan, 72 N.C. 103; Fisher v. Mining Co., 105 N.C. 126.

(346)


Summaries of

Seymour v. Cohen

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1872
67 N.C. 345 (N.C. 1872)
Case details for

Seymour v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:JOHN F. SEYMOUR CO. v. S. COHEN et al

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1872

Citations

67 N.C. 345 (N.C. 1872)

Citing Cases

Sutton v. McMillan

" ( Seymour v. Cohen, 67 N.C. 345, cited and approved.) This was a MOTION by the defendant, upon affidavit,…

Fisher v. Mining Co.

Treated simply as a judgment to set aside the (126) order entered at June Term, it could not have been made…