From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sexton v. Minnesota Life Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2012
No.: 2:12-CV-00736-JAM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)

Opinion

No.: 2:12-CV-00736-JAM-EFB

07-2-2012

MONIKA SEXTON, Plaintiff, v. MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; SUNGARD DATA SYSTEMS, INC.; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT


The Honorable John A. Mendez


Trial Date: None set

Upon due consideration of the parties' Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant Minnesota Life Insurance Company to Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and finding good cause therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Minnesota Life Insurance Company shall respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint on or before July 16, 2012.

______________

The Honorable John A. Mendez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sexton v. Minnesota Life Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2012
No.: 2:12-CV-00736-JAM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Sexton v. Minnesota Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MONIKA SEXTON, Plaintiff, v. MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; SUNGARD…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 2, 2012

Citations

No.: 2:12-CV-00736-JAM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)