From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sewraz v. Guice

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 20, 2009
318 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-8173.

Submitted: March 17, 2009.

Decided: March 20, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00035-RLW).

Chetanand Kumar Sewraz, Appellant Pro Se.

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Chetanand Kumar Sewraz appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewraz v. Guice, No. 3:08-cv-00035-RLW, 2008 WL 3926443 (E.D.Va. Aug. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Sewraz v. Guice

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 20, 2009
318 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Sewraz v. Guice

Case Details

Full title:Chetanand Kumar SEWRAZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward GUICE, Lieutenant…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Mar 20, 2009

Citations

318 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Sewraz v. Guice

On March 20, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the decision of this…

McDonald v. Hazelton

"Even pro se plaintiffs must recognize Rule 8's vision for `a system of simplified pleadings that give notice…