From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sewell v. Wagner

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 30, 2018
No. 17-2137 (4th Cir. Jan. 30, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-2137

01-30-2018

STARSHA M. SEWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVID WAGNER, ESQ., Defendant - Appellee.

Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:16-cv-02458-GJH) Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court's orders dismissing this action for failure to state a claim and denying her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Wagner, No. 8:16-cv-02458-GJH (D. Md. July 27, Aug. 29, and Sept. 18, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Sewell v. Wagner

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 30, 2018
No. 17-2137 (4th Cir. Jan. 30, 2018)
Case details for

Sewell v. Wagner

Case Details

Full title:STARSHA M. SEWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVID WAGNER, ESQ., Defendant…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 30, 2018

Citations

No. 17-2137 (4th Cir. Jan. 30, 2018)