Opinion
No. 10-6463.
Submitted: February 10, 2011.
Decided: February 17, 2011.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:09-cv-00693-DKC).
Emmanuel Edward Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip M. Pickus, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, Philip Melton Andrews, Kramon Graham, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Emmanuel Edward Sewell appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Rowley, No. 8:09-cv-00693-DKC, 2010 WL 1068055 (D.Md. Mar. 18, 2010). We further deny Sewell's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.