Opinion
22-1330
10-17-2022
Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: October 13, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Lydia Kay Griggsby, District Judge. (8:21-cv-00126-LKG)
Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Sewell's pro se employment discrimination action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Sewell's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, she has forfeited appellate review of the appealed-from order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ("The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief."). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED