From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sewell v. Mayorkas

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 17, 2022
No. 22-1330 (4th Cir. Oct. 17, 2022)

Opinion

22-1330

10-17-2022

STARSHA M. SEWELL, a/k/a Evelina M, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Defendant-Appellee.

Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: October 13, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Lydia Kay Griggsby, District Judge. (8:21-cv-00126-LKG)

Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Sewell's pro se employment discrimination action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Sewell's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, she has forfeited appellate review of the appealed-from order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ("The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief."). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Sewell v. Mayorkas

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 17, 2022
No. 22-1330 (4th Cir. Oct. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Sewell v. Mayorkas

Case Details

Full title:STARSHA M. SEWELL, a/k/a Evelina M, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALEJANDRO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 17, 2022

Citations

No. 22-1330 (4th Cir. Oct. 17, 2022)