From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sewell v. Green

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 28, 2011
413 F. App'x 668 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-6392.

Submitted: February 24, 2011.

Decided: February 28, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:08-cv-01027-DKC).

Emmanuel Edward Sewell, Appellant pro se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Emmanuel Edward Sewell appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Green, No. 8:08-cv-01027-DKC, 2010 WL 583919 (D.Md. Feb. 16, 2010). We deny Sewell's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Sewell has filed a document entitled "Motion of Issues on Appeal of the Lower Courts [sic] Judgment" that appears to be his brief on appeal. We deny the motion.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Sewell v. Green

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 28, 2011
413 F. App'x 668 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Sewell v. Green

Case Details

Full title:Emmanuel Edward SEWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathleen GREEN; Michael…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 28, 2011

Citations

413 F. App'x 668 (4th Cir. 2011)