From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seward Park Hsg. v. Honest Ballot Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 4, 2001
287 A.D.2d 266 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

October 4, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered December 8, 2000, which denied plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, vacated the temporary restraining order granted in their favor, dismissed the complaint and directed defendant Honest Ballot Association to count the contested proxy ballots and certify the results of the election, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Elliott S. Martin, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Steven S. Anderson, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Williams, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Ellerin, Saxe, JJ.


The motion court correctly held that the notarization of ballots of cooperative shareholders by their proxy holder, not a candidate himself but an active backer of one of the competing slates, is not a reason, per se, to void such ballots (see, McKenna v. Double G Dev. Corp., 251 A.D.2d 202).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Seward Park Hsg. v. Honest Ballot Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 4, 2001
287 A.D.2d 266 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Seward Park Hsg. v. Honest Ballot Assoc

Case Details

Full title:SEWARD PARK HOUSING CORPORATION, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HONEST…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 4, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 266 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
730 N.Y.S.2d 510

Citing Cases

Brodsky v. Board of Managers

I therefore find that there is no basis for invalidating the proxies acknowledged by Remy Bernardo and that a…