From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sewall v. Csernansky

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
May 29, 2007
225 F. App'x 414 (8th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-2680.

Submitted: May 23, 2007.

Filed: May 29, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Maureen C. Sewall, St. Louis, MO, pro se.

Robert S. Rosenthal, Michael T. Ward, Brown James, St. Louis, MO, for Appellee.

Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


Maureen Sewall appeals from the district court's dismissal of her pro se civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon de novo review, see Osborn v. United States, 918 F.2d 724, 730 (8th Cir. 1990), we conclude that the district court correctly dismissed Sewall's complaint against Dr. Csernansky for the reasons explained by the district court.

The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court's decision. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny as moot appellee's pending motion to dismiss.


Summaries of

Sewall v. Csernansky

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
May 29, 2007
225 F. App'x 414 (8th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Sewall v. Csernansky

Case Details

Full title:Maureen C. SEWALL, Appellant, v. John G. CSERNANSKY, M.D., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: May 29, 2007

Citations

225 F. App'x 414 (8th Cir. 2007)