From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sevey v. Soliz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2011
No. C 10-3677 LHK (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 10-3677 LHK (PR)

10-27-2011

ANDREW SEVEY, Plaintiff, v. SOLIZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING

DEFENDANTS TO FILE

OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION TO COMPEL

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an amended civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that employees of the Lake County Sheriff's Department violated his constitutional rights. On September 12, 2011, Plaintiff filed a second motion to compel discovery. (Docket No. 51.) Defendants shall file, within twenty (20) days of the filing date of this order, an opposition to Plaintiff's motion to compel, or a notice that they have complied with Plaintiff's discovery requests. Plaintiff shall file his reply fifteen (15) days thereafter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sevey v. Soliz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2011
No. C 10-3677 LHK (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Sevey v. Soliz

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW SEVEY, Plaintiff, v. SOLIZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Citations

No. C 10-3677 LHK (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)