From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sessoms v. Unknown

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 13, 2022
2:22-cv-00420-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00420-TLN-AC

06-13-2022

TIO DINERO SESSOMS, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondent.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge.

Petitioner, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 7, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 7.) Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 8.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed April 7, 2022 (ECF No. 7), are adopted in full;

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction; and

3. The Court declines to issue the Certificate of Appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.


Summaries of

Sessoms v. Unknown

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 13, 2022
2:22-cv-00420-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Sessoms v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:TIO DINERO SESSOMS, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 13, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00420-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)