From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sessoms v. Runnels

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec 15, 2011
665 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 08–17790.

2011-12-15

Tio Dinero SESSOMS, Petitioner–Appellant, v. D.L. RUNNELS, Respondent–Appellee.

Eric Martin Weaver, Law Offices of Eric M. Weaver, Albany, CA, for Petitioner–Appellant. Jeffrey Firestone, Deputy Attorney General, California Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent–Appellee.


Eric Martin Weaver, Law Offices of Eric M. Weaver, Albany, CA, for Petitioner–Appellant. Jeffrey Firestone, Deputy Attorney General, California Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent–Appellee.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

Sessoms v. Runnels

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec 15, 2011
665 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Sessoms v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:Tio Dinero SESSOMS, Petitioner–Appellant, v. D.L. RUNNELS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Dec 15, 2011

Citations

665 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir. 2011)