Opinion
No. 3D22-44.
01-04-2023
Ghidotti | Berger LLP, and Chase A. Berger , Tara Rosenfeld , and Jason L. Duggar , for appellant. Neil Rose (Hollywood); Howard S. Weinstein P.A., and Howard S. Weinstein (Hollywood), for appellee. Before EMAS, HENDON and MILLER, JJ.
Ghidotti | Berger LLP, and Chase A. Berger , Tara Rosenfeld , and Jason L. Duggar , for appellant.
Neil Rose (Hollywood); Howard S. Weinstein P.A., and Howard S. Weinstein (Hollywood), for appellee.
Before EMAS, HENDON and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Jersey Palm-Gross, Inc. v. Paper, 658 So.2d 531, 535 (Fla. 1995) (holding that "a usury savings clause cannot, by itself, absolutely insulate a lender from a finding of usury.... Rather, [it is] one factor to be considered in the overall determination of whether the lender intended to exact a usurious interest rate;" further observing "that a contrary holding would permit a lender to `relieve himself of the pains and penalties visited by law upon such an act by merely writing into the contract a disclaimer of any intention to do that which under his contract he has plainly done.'") (Additional citations omitted.)