Opinion
SC22-61
03-11-2022
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED.
Lower Tribunal No(s).: 532001CF003262A0XXXX
The petition for writ of prohibition is hereby denied because Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that a lower court is attempting to act in excess of its jurisdiction, and Petitioner has an adequate remedy to address his claim on direct appeal. See Sutton v. State, 975 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 2008); English v. McCrary, 348 So.2d 293 (Fla. 1977).
CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, MUÑIZ, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
HON. DONALD G. JACOBSEN, JUDGE.