From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Serrano v. Hull

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jan 5, 2018
No. 17cv848 WJ/KK (D.N.M. Jan. 5, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17cv848 WJ/KK

01-05-2018

RUDOLPH SERRANO, Plaintiff, v. MAYOR GREGORY HULL, OFFICER BRANDON MCKINNEY, and SERGEANT BUHL, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Rudolph Serrano's failure to timely file an amended complaint.

The Court dismissed Plaintiff's original Complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted because Plaintiff's allegations did not state with particularity what each Defendant did to him, how their actions harmed him and what specific right he believes Defendants violated. See Doc. 5 at 4, filed December 20, 2017. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint and notified Plaintiff that failure to timely file an amended complaint may result in dismissal of this case without prejudice. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint by the January 4, 2017, deadline.

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

/s/ _________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Serrano v. Hull

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jan 5, 2018
No. 17cv848 WJ/KK (D.N.M. Jan. 5, 2018)
Case details for

Serrano v. Hull

Case Details

Full title:RUDOLPH SERRANO, Plaintiff, v. MAYOR GREGORY HULL, OFFICER BRANDON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Jan 5, 2018

Citations

No. 17cv848 WJ/KK (D.N.M. Jan. 5, 2018)