From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Serrano v. Folino

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 30, 2007
Civil Action No. 05-1118 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-1118.

January 30, 2007


ORDER


The Plaintiff in this case filed a Motion for Leave to Supplement Complaint (Doc. No. 7) on September 19, 2005. The Court granted the motion by Order of Court (Doc. No. 8) on September 28, 2005. Plaintiff, however, failed to name all of the Defendants in the caption of his Supplemental Complaint, although they are clearly listed in the caption of the Motion to Supplement. This is a clerical error on behalf of the Plaintiff that went unnoticed at the time of filing, but an error that is easily remedied. This order will provide that remedy and make sure the docket accurately reflects the caption of the case. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED this 30th day of January, 2007, that the Clerk of Court is directed to amend the caption of this case to include Defendants Harry E. Wilson, Linda D. Harris and Robert Tretinik. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are allowed ten (10) days from this date to appeal this order to a district judge pursuant to Rule 72.1.3(B) of the Local Rules for Magistrates. Failure to appeal within ten (10) days may constitute waiver of the right to appeal.


Summaries of

Serrano v. Folino

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 30, 2007
Civil Action No. 05-1118 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2007)
Case details for

Serrano v. Folino

Case Details

Full title:DAVID SERRANO, Plaintiff, v. LOUIS FOLINO, Superintendent; THOMAS JACKSON…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 30, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-1118 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2007)