From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Serrano v. Doctors

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 30, 2010
9:08-CV-745 Lead Case (NAM/ATB), 9:08-CV-1017 Member Case (NAM/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2010)

Opinion

9:08-CV-745 Lead Case (NAM/ATB), 9:08-CV-1017 Member Case (NAM/ATB).

September 30, 2010

JUAN SERRANO, Plaintiff pro se.

C. HARRIS DAGUE, Asst. Attorney General, Attorneys for Defendants.


ORDER


The above matter comes to me following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter, duly filed on the 9th day of September 2010. Following fourteen (14) days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.

After careful review of all of the papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, and no objections submitted thereto, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety.

2. The Lead Case No. 9:08-CV-745 and Member Case No. 9:08-CV-1017 are dismissed with prejudice in their entirety pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to Prosecute.

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon all parties and the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 30, 2010

Syracuse, New York


Summaries of

Serrano v. Doctors

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 30, 2010
9:08-CV-745 Lead Case (NAM/ATB), 9:08-CV-1017 Member Case (NAM/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Serrano v. Doctors

Case Details

Full title:JUAN SERRANO, Plaintiff, v. DOCTORS, et al., Defendant. JUAN SERANNO…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Sep 30, 2010

Citations

9:08-CV-745 Lead Case (NAM/ATB), 9:08-CV-1017 Member Case (NAM/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2010)