From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Serrano-Serrano v. Wolfe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 13, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-2257 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 13, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-2257

06-13-2012

ALEXANDER SERRANO-SERRANO Plaintiff, v. PSP TRP. WOLFE, et al., Defendants.


(Judge Kosik)


ORDER

AND NOW, THIS 13th DAY OF JUNE, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Andrew Smyser dated May 15, 2012 (Doc. 48) is ADOPTED in that no objections have been filed;

(2) The motion to dismiss the complaint of defendant Rollings-Mazza (Doc. 27) is GRANTED in that it is unopposed by plaintiff (See Doc. 47);

(3) Defendant Rollings-Mazza is DISMISSED from this action; and

(4) The above-captioned action is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

_______________

Edwin M. Kosik

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Serrano-Serrano v. Wolfe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 13, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-2257 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Serrano-Serrano v. Wolfe

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER SERRANO-SERRANO Plaintiff, v. PSP TRP. WOLFE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 13, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-2257 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 13, 2012)