Opinion
8:23-cv-1160-MSS-CPT
02-12-2024
MICHAEL JOHN SERNETT, Plaintiff, v. WALMART STORES EAST, L.P., Defendant.
ORDER
MARY S. SCRIVEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Affirmative Defenses 2, 3, 6, 10, 16, 17, 22, 23, 24, and 27 or, in the alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement. (Dkt. 18) Upon consideration of all relevant filings, case law, and being otherwise fully advised, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Strike. Defendant has withdrawn Affirmative Defenses 1, 8, 11, 12, 18, 19, 25, 26, 28, and 29. (Dkt. 17) The Court finds that Defendant's remaining Affirmative Defenses 2, 3, 6, 10, 16, 17, 22, 23, 24, and 27 are sufficiently pled to permit Plaintiff to respond and raise a defense against those Affirmative Defenses.
Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Affirmative Defenses 2, 3, 6, 10, 16, 17, 22, 23, 24, and 27 or, in the alternative, Motion for a More Definite
Statement, (Dkt. 18), is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED.