Opinion
March, 1910.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P.J., who dissented, upon the ground that Israel Serling was not a superintendent nor exercising acts of superintendence at the time of the accident.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Serling v. Serling
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1910
137 App. Div. 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Summaries of
Serling v. Serling
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1910
137 App. Div. 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for
Serling v. Serling
Case Details
Full title:Meyer Serling, Respondent, v. Harry Serling and Charles Serling, Appellants
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Mar 1, 1910
Citations
137 App. Div. 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)