From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Serio v. United States

U.S.
Jun 10, 1968
392 U.S. 305 (1968)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.

No. 200, Misc.

Decided June 10, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 126 U.S.App.D.C. 297, 377 F.2d 936, vacated and remanded.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Paul C. Summitt for the United States.


The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Serio v. United States

U.S.
Jun 10, 1968
392 U.S. 305 (1968)
Case details for

Serio v. United States

Case Details

Full title:SERIO v . UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 10, 1968

Citations

392 U.S. 305 (1968)

Citing Cases

United States v. Sims

392 U.S. 295, 88 S.Ct. 1922. In three of these cases, Hunt v. Connecticut, 392 U.S. 304, 88 S.Ct. 2063, 20…

U.S. v. Grindstaff

The prosecuting attorneys claim also that the fact that the evidence shows Mr. Grindstaff was in possession…