From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seoane v. Seoane

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 3, 1987
514 So. 2d 430 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 87-1695.

November 3, 1987.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Fredericka G. Smith, Judge.

Villalobos Ramos and Ameli Padron-Fragetta, Miami, for appellant.

Myra Bennett Torres, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.


Agreeing with the trial court that appellant's prior actions, in and out of court, are inconsistent with his current position that appellee is not entitled to relief, we affirm the Order Declaring that Husband is Estopped from Denying the Validity of his Dominican Divorce. See Arnold v. Arnold, 500 So.2d 739 (Fla.3d DCA 1987); Clagett v. King, 308 A.2d 245 (D.C.App. 1973); Mayer v. Mayer, 66 N.C. App. 522, 311 S.E.2d 659, review denied, 311 N.C. 760, 321 S.E.2d 140 (1984).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Seoane v. Seoane

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 3, 1987
514 So. 2d 430 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Seoane v. Seoane

Case Details

Full title:ANGEL ANTONIO SEOANE, APPELLANT, v. FRANCISCA MILIAN SEOANE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 3, 1987

Citations

514 So. 2d 430 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Lopes v. Lopes

For these reasons the husband was equitably estopped from raising the validity of the marriage, and annulment…

Lambertini v. Lambertini

For these reasons the husband was equitably estopped from raising the validity of the marriage, and annulment…