From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SENN v. WELCH, WELCH

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1927
220 App. Div. 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

May, 1927.

Present — Hubbs, P.J., Clark, Sears, Taylor and Sawyer, JJ.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that while the exclusion of defendant's statement that he had no knowledge of the frozen condition of the plumbing was error, his testimony as a whole made his claim in that regard clearly manifest so that no harm followed. The verdict is based on a fair conflict of evidence and should not under such circumstances be disturbed. All concur.


Summaries of

SENN v. WELCH, WELCH

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1927
220 App. Div. 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

SENN v. WELCH, WELCH

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH SENN, Respondent, v. WILLIAM H. WELCH and ETTA WELCH, Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 1, 1927

Citations

220 App. Div. 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)