From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seniuk v. Birney

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Feb 15, 2017
166 A.3d 1224 (Pa. 2017)

Opinion

No. 636 MAL 2016

02-15-2017

NY SENIUK, Petitioner v. Claire BIRNEY, Respondent


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.


Summaries of

Seniuk v. Birney

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Feb 15, 2017
166 A.3d 1224 (Pa. 2017)
Case details for

Seniuk v. Birney

Case Details

Full title:NY SENIUK, Petitioner v. CLAIRE BIRNEY, Respondent

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 15, 2017

Citations

166 A.3d 1224 (Pa. 2017)