From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Senftner v. Bimbo Bakeries United States, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Nov 17, 2021
966 N.W.2d 492 (Minn. 2021)

Opinion

A21-0702

11-17-2021

James SENFTNER, Relator, v. BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC. and ACE USA, Respondents.

James T. Hansing, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for relator. James S. Pikala, Emily A. LaCourse, Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.


James T. Hansing, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for relator.

James S. Pikala, Emily A. LaCourse, Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER

G. Barry Anderson, Associate Justice Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed May 4, 2021, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton , 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that summary affirmances lack precedential value "because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," and because they "do no more than establish the law of the case").


Summaries of

Senftner v. Bimbo Bakeries United States, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Nov 17, 2021
966 N.W.2d 492 (Minn. 2021)
Case details for

Senftner v. Bimbo Bakeries United States, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:James SENFTNER, Relator, v. BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC. and ACE USA…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Date published: Nov 17, 2021

Citations

966 N.W.2d 492 (Minn. 2021)

Citing Cases

Schmidt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

SeeLagasse , 982 N.W.2d at 202.See alsoSenftner v. Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. , No. WC20-6385, 2021 WL 2005324,…