From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Senfner v. Bimbo Bakeries U.S. Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Nov 17, 2021
No. A21-0702 (Minn. Nov. 17, 2021)

Opinion

A21-0702

11-17-2021

James Senfner, Relator, v. Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. and ACE USA, Respondents.

James T. Hansing, Minneapolis, Minnesota, fr relator. James S. Pikala, Emily A. Lacourse, Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.


Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

James T. Hansing, Minneapolis, Minnesota, fr relator.

James S. Pikala, Emily A. Lacourse, Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.

ORDER

G. BARRY ANDERSON ASSOCIATE JUSTICE

Based upon all the fles, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals fled May 4, 2021, be, and the same is, affrmed without opinion. See Hoj v. Kempton, 31 7 N.W .2d 3 61, 3 66 (Minn. 19 82) (explaining that summary affirmances lack precedential value "because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," and because they "do no more than establish the law of the case").


Summaries of

Senfner v. Bimbo Bakeries U.S. Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Nov 17, 2021
No. A21-0702 (Minn. Nov. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Senfner v. Bimbo Bakeries U.S. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:James Senfner, Relator, v. Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. and ACE USA…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Nov 17, 2021

Citations

No. A21-0702 (Minn. Nov. 17, 2021)