From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SENECA INSURANCE CO. v. HONG KONG HANG WO [1st Dept 2000

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 6, 2000
(N.Y. App. Div. Jan. 6, 2000)

Opinion

January 6, 2000

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner-Gans, J.), entered October 7, 1998, which, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the total sum of $78,985.18, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Theodore Oshman, for plaintiff-respondent.

Howard J. Goldstein, for defendant-appellant.

NARDELLI, J.P., TOM, MAZZARELLI, ELLERIN, FRIEDMAN, JJ.


Defendant failed to controvert the trial evidence tending to establish plaintiff's standing as a duly licensed insurance company. Moreover, defendant failed to affirmatively plead the defenses it now raises in regard to plaintiff's status. Hence, these defenses were waived. Also waived was defendant's claim of jurisdictional deficiency based upon plaintiff's failure to timely file an affidavit of service, since defendant appeared and defended the action without raising that jurisdictional objection (see, Matter of Fry v. Vil. of Tarrytown, 89 N.Y.2d 714).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

SENECA INSURANCE CO. v. HONG KONG HANG WO [1st Dept 2000

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 6, 2000
(N.Y. App. Div. Jan. 6, 2000)
Case details for

SENECA INSURANCE CO. v. HONG KONG HANG WO [1st Dept 2000

Case Details

Full title:SENECA INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HONG KONG HANG WO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 6, 2000

Citations

(N.Y. App. Div. Jan. 6, 2000)