From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sendor v. Chervin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 27, 2008
51 A.D.3d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-06174.

May 27, 2008.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a covenant not to compete, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated May 21, 2007, which granted the motion of the defendant Cary Rosner for summary judgment dismissing the first, third, fifth, and seventh causes of action insofar as asserted against him.

Law Offices of P.B. Tufariello, P.C. Mount Sinai, N.Y. (Panagiota Tufariello of counsel), for appellants.

Robinson, Brog, Leinwand, Greene, Genovese Glick, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Gary P. Adelman and Jeremy J. Bethel of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Fisher, J.P., Ritter, Florio and Carni, JJ.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion of the defendant Cary Rosner for summary judgment dismissing the first, third, fifth, and seventh causes of action insofar as asserted against him is denied.

The defendant Cary Rosner failed to include a complete set of the pleadings in support of his summary judgment motion, as required by CPLR 3212 (b). Accordingly, he was not entitled to summary judgment and denial of his motion was required ( see Thompson v Foreign Cars Ctr., Inc., 40 AD3d 965; Matsyuk v Konkalipos, 35 AD3d 675; Sted Tenants Owners Corp. v Chumpitaz, 5 AD3d 663).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the plaintiffs' remaining contentions.

[ See 2007 NY Slip Op 31364(U).]


Summaries of

Sendor v. Chervin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 27, 2008
51 A.D.3d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Sendor v. Chervin

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS SENDOR et al., Appellants, v. MATTHEW CHERVIN et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 27, 2008

Citations

51 A.D.3d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 4858
857 N.Y.S.2d 500

Citing Cases

Zellner v. Tarnell

The plaintiffs sellers failed to include a complete set of the pleadings and an affidavit in support of…

Ramsey v. CEC Entm't., Inc.

Although plaintiffs did not raise this deficiency in opposition to the motion, the requirement of a complete…