From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sender v. Franklin Resources, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Nov 3, 2011
Case No.: 11-cv-3828 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 11-cv-3828 EMC.

November 3, 2011.

GOLD BENNETT CERA SIDENER LLP, Solomon B. Cera, Solomon B. Cera (SBN #99467), Gwendolyn R. Giblin (SBN #181973), C. Andrew Dirksen (SBN #197378), Attorneys for Plaintiff.

TRUCKER HUSS, A Professional Corporation, R. Bradford Huss (SBN #71303), Charles M. Dyke (SBN #183900), Virginia H. Perkins (SBN #215832), San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Franklin Resources, Inc.


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD IN RESPONSE TO OCTOBER 20, 2011 ORDER


WHEREAS on October 20, 2011 the Court entered its order denying plaintiff’s motion to remand and granting defendant’s motion to dismiss based on complete ERISA preemption (“Order”); and

WHEREAS the Court gave Plaintiff to and including November 9, 2011 to file an amended complaint; and

WHEREAS Plaintiff has requested that Defendant agree to an extension to November 30, 2011 to plead in response to the Order; and

WHEREAS Defendant does not oppose Plaintiff’s request for an extension, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, through their counsel of record, that Plaintiff may have to and including November 30, 2011 to plead in response to the Order.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation, Plaintiff may have to and including November 30, 2011 to plead in response to the Order (Dkt. 25).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sender v. Franklin Resources, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Nov 3, 2011
Case No.: 11-cv-3828 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Sender v. Franklin Resources, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SENDER v. FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC. (N.D.Cal. 11-3-2011)

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Nov 3, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 11-cv-3828 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)