Semrow v. Grohar

Full title: Joanne Semrow, Appellant, v. John Grohar, Jr., Appellee

Court: Appellate Court of Illinois

Date published: Sep 23, 1941

311 Ill. App. 542 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)

36 N.E.2d 752

Opinion

Gen. No. 9,627. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed September 23, 1941

1. APPEAL AND ERROR, § 1021^_ — brief and argument failing to point out error. Alleged error of trial court in its rulings on the admission and rejection of testimony, and objections to conduct of counsel during trial, held abandoned where appellant failed to set forth in his brief and argument the rulings, testimony or conduct objected to, and failed to disclose where they could be found in the abstract.

_ See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

2. SAVING QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW, § 102^fn_ — new trial motion, review of evidence dependent upon. Sufficiency of the evidence could not be reviewed where no motion for new trial was made in the trial court.

3. SAVING QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW, § 37^fn_ — instructions, objections and exceptions as required. Where instructions complained of were substantially correct and jury was fairly instructed upon the issues, alleged error with respect thereto would not be considered, as no objections or exceptions had been made or taken in the trial court.

Appeal from Circuit Court of Will county; Hon. ROSCOE C. SOUTH, presiding.

Affirmed. Heard in this court at February term, 1941.

William H. Fields, for appellant;

Francis J. Loughran, for appellee.

Opinion by JUSTICE DOVE.

"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed September 23, 1941.