From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Semple v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 13, 2003
301 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-00685

Submitted December 5, 2002.

January 13, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant New York City Transit Authority appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), entered December 17, 2001, as, upon a jury verdict finding that the plaintiff sustained damages in the sums of $134,000 for past pain and suffering, and $95,000 for future pain and suffering, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it.

Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Anita Isola of counsel), for appellant.

Salzman, Ingber Winer, New York, N.Y. (Alexander J. Wulwick of counsel), for respondent.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when her leg became caught in the door of a bus she was attempting to board on September 9, 1996. After a jury trial on the issue of liability, the defendant New York City Transit Authority was found 100% at fault in the happening of the plaintiff's accident. During the trial on the issue of damages, the plaintiff, who was 60 years old at the time of the injury, presented evidence that she sustained a tear of the medial meniscus and a possible tear of the medial collateral ligament in her left knee. Her physician testified that she would suffer pain and limited use of her left knee for the rest of her life. Although surgery was recommended, the plaintiff opted not to undergo surgery due to unrelated health concerns.

Upon consideration of the evidence adduced at trial, the jury awards for past and future pain and suffering did not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see CPLR 5501[c]; Cotto v. Coyle, 258 A.D.2d 554; Adams v. New York State Thruway Auth., 228 A.D.2d 627; cf. Van Ness v. New York City Tr. Auth., 288 A.D.2d 374; Frascarelli v. Port Authority of N.Y. and N. J., 269 A.D.2d 422; Parros v. 1500 Realty Co., 226 A.D.2d 607; Burton v. New York City Hous. Auth., 191 A.D.2d 669).

FLORIO, J.P., FRIEDMANN, McGINITY and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Semple v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 13, 2003
301 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Semple v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:MAUDE SEMPLE, respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 13, 2003

Citations

301 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 384

Citing Cases

Cullen v. Thumser

Under the circumstances of this case, the jury's award for past pain and suffering was inadequate to the…

Coleman v. Karimov

"Although prior damage awards in cases involving similar injuries are not binding upon the courts, they guide…