From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Semper v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 18, 2022
2:20-cv-01875-JCM-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 18, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01875-JCM-EJY

10-18-2022

CONNIE SEMPER[1], an individual; ASHLEY MEDLOCK, an individual; LONICIA BOWIE, an individual; MICHAEL GREEN, an individual; CLINTON REECE, an individual; COREY JOHNSON, an individual; DEMARLO RILEY, an individual; CORY BASS, an individual; CARLOS BASS, an individual; BREANNA NELLUMS, an individual; and ANTONIO WILLIAMS, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, in its official capacity; ANDREW BAUMAN, individually and in his capacity as a Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Officer; DAVID JEONG, individually and in his capacity as a Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Officer; SUPREET KAUR, individually and in his capacity as a Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Officer; MATTHEW KRAVETZ, individually and in his capacity as a Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Officer; and THERON YOUNG, individually and in his capacity as a Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Officer, Defendants.

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEVADA Christopher M. Peterson, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Connie Denise Semper, as Special Administrator for the Estate of Phillip Semper, Corey Johnson, Ashley Medlock, Michael Green, Demarlo Riley, Clinton Reece, and Lonicia Bowie MARQUIS AURBACH Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Jackie V. Nichols, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Andrew Bauman, Matthew Kravetz, Supreet Kaur, David Jeong, and Theron Young


AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEVADA

Christopher M. Peterson, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Connie Denise Semper, as Special Administrator for the Estate of Phillip Semper, Corey Johnson, Ashley Medlock, Michael Green, Demarlo Riley, Clinton Reece, and Lonicia Bowie

MARQUIS AURBACH

Craig R. Anderson, Esq.

Jackie V. Nichols, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Andrew Bauman, Matthew Kravetz, Supreet Kaur, David Jeong, and Theron Young

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND LVMPD DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

(FIRST REQUEST)

The Represented Plaintiffs, Connie Denise Semper, as Special Administrator for the Estate of Phillip Semper, Corey Johnson, Ashley Medlock, Michael Green, Demarlo Riley, Clinton Reece, and Lonicia Bowie, by and through their counsel of record, Christopher M. Peterson, Esq., of American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada and Defendants, the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (the “Department” or “LVMPD”), Andrew Bauman (“Bauman”), Matthew Kravetz (“Kravetz”), Supreet Kaur (“Kaur”), David Jeong (“Jeong”), and Theron Young (“Young”), collectively (“LVMPD Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record, Craig R. Anderson, Esq. and Jackie V. Nichols, Esq., of Marquis Aurbach, hereby agree and jointly stipulate the following:

1. LVMPD Defendants filed its Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint on September 26, 2022 [ECF No. 92];

2. Plaintiffs' Opposition to LVMPD Defendants filed its Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint was filed on October 11, 2022 [ECF No. 94];

3. LVMPD Defendants' counsel has a scheduling conflict and is unable to meet the deadline of October 18, 2022 currently scheduled for LVMPD Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint;

4. The Parties have agreed to a 1-day extension for LVMPD Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint;

5. Accordingly, the deadline for LVMPD Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, currently due on October 18, 2022, be extended to and including Wednesday, October 19, 2022;

6. This is the Parties' first request to extend the deadline to LVMPD Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint; and

7. This Stipulation is being entered in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The above Stipulation is hereby GRANTED.


Summaries of

Semper v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 18, 2022
2:20-cv-01875-JCM-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Semper v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:CONNIE SEMPER[1], an individual; ASHLEY MEDLOCK, an individual; LONICIA…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 18, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-01875-JCM-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 18, 2022)