Opinion
2:20-cv-01875-JCM-EJY
08-23-2022
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEVADA Christopher M. Peterson Christopher M. Peterson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13932 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Connie Denise Semper, as Special Administrator for the Estate of Phillip Semper, Corey Johnson, Ashley Medlock, Michael Green, Demarlo Riley, Clinton Reece, and Lonicia Bowie MARQUIS AURBACH Jackie V. Nichols Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Jackie V. Nichols, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14246 Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Sheriff Joseph Lombardo, Andrew Bauman, Matthew Kravetz, Supreet Kaur, David Jeong, and Theron Young
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEVADA
Christopher M. Peterson
Christopher M. Peterson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13932
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Connie Denise
Semper, as Special Administrator for the Estate of Phillip Semper, Corey Johnson, Ashley Medlock, Michael Green, Demarlo Riley, Clinton Reece, and Lonicia Bowie
MARQUIS AURBACH
Jackie V. Nichols
Craig R. Anderson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 6882
Jackie V. Nichols, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14246
Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas
Metropolitan Police Department, Sheriff Joseph Lombardo, Andrew Bauman, Matthew Kravetz, Supreet Kaur, David Jeong, and Theron Young
STIPULATION AND ORDER
The Represented Plaintiffs, Connie Denise Semper, as Special Administrator for the Estate of Phillip Semper, Corey Johnson, Ashley Medlock, Michael Green, Demarlo Riley, Clinton Reece, and Lonicia Bowie, by and through their counsel of record, Christopher M. Peterson, Esq., of American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada and Defendants, the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (the “Department” or “LVMPD”), Sheriff Joseph Lombardo (“Lombardo”), Andrew Bauman (“Bauman”), Matthew Kravetz (“Kravetz”), Supreet Kaur (“Kaur”), David Jeong (“Jeong”), and Theron Young (“Young”), collectively (“LVMPD Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record, Craig R. Anderson, Esq. and Jackie V. Nichols, Esq., of Marquis Aurbach, hereby agree and jointly stipulate the following:
1. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15, the Represented Plaintiffs and LVMPD Defendants agree to the filing of the Second Amended Complaint as proposed to the Motion for Leave to Amend. See ECF No. 82.
2. The Represented Parties and LVMPD Defendants agree that an Answer or Motion to Dismiss shall be due 21 days from the filing of the Second Amended Complaint.
3. The instant stipulation is being made in good faith and not for purposes of delay and that no party waives any arguments by entering into this stipulation.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above Stipulation (ECF No. 87) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (ECF No. 82) is DENIED as moot.