From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Semper v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 23, 2022
2:20-cv-01875-JCM-EJY (D. Nev. Aug. 23, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01875-JCM-EJY

08-23-2022

PHILLIP SEMPER, an individual; COREY JOHNSON, an individual; ASHLEY MEDLOCK, an individual; CORY BASS, an individual; MICHAEL GREEN, an individual; DEMARLO RILEY, an individual; BREANNA NELLUMS, an individual; CLINTON REECE, an individual; ANTONIO WILLIAMS, an individual; LONICIA BOWIE, an individual; CARLOS BASS, an individual; and DEMETREUS BEARD, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, in its official capacity; SHERIFF JOSEPH LOMBARDO, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department; ANDREW BAUMAN, individually and in his capacity as a Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Officer; MATTHEW KRAVETZ, individually and in his capacity as a Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Officer; SUPREET KAUR, individually and in his capacity as a Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Officer; DAVID JEONG, individually and in his capacity as a Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Officer; THERON YOUNG, individually and in his capacity as a Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Officer; CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION D/B/A RIO ALL-SUITES HOTEL; RIO PROPERTIES, LLC; JOHN CARLISLE, individually and in his capacity as an employee of the Rio Hotel & Casino; DOE LVMPD GANG TASK FORCE OFFICERS 1-10; DOE LVMPD OFFICERS 1-10; DOE LVMPD SUPERVISORS 1-5; DOE RIO EMPLOYEES 1-10, Defendants.

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEVADA Christopher M. Peterson Christopher M. Peterson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13932 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Connie Denise Semper, as Special Administrator for the Estate of Phillip Semper, Corey Johnson, Ashley Medlock, Michael Green, Demarlo Riley, Clinton Reece, and Lonicia Bowie MARQUIS AURBACH Jackie V. Nichols Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Jackie V. Nichols, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14246 Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Sheriff Joseph Lombardo, Andrew Bauman, Matthew Kravetz, Supreet Kaur, David Jeong, and Theron Young


AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEVADA

Christopher M. Peterson

Christopher M. Peterson, Esq.

Nevada Bar No. 13932

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Connie Denise

Semper, as Special Administrator for the Estate of Phillip Semper, Corey Johnson, Ashley Medlock, Michael Green, Demarlo Riley, Clinton Reece, and Lonicia Bowie

MARQUIS AURBACH

Jackie V. Nichols

Craig R. Anderson, Esq.

Nevada Bar No. 6882

Jackie V. Nichols, Esq.

Nevada Bar No. 14246

Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas

Metropolitan Police Department, Sheriff Joseph Lombardo, Andrew Bauman, Matthew Kravetz, Supreet Kaur, David Jeong, and Theron Young

STIPULATION AND ORDER

The Represented Plaintiffs, Connie Denise Semper, as Special Administrator for the Estate of Phillip Semper, Corey Johnson, Ashley Medlock, Michael Green, Demarlo Riley, Clinton Reece, and Lonicia Bowie, by and through their counsel of record, Christopher M. Peterson, Esq., of American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada and Defendants, the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (the “Department” or “LVMPD”), Sheriff Joseph Lombardo (“Lombardo”), Andrew Bauman (“Bauman”), Matthew Kravetz (“Kravetz”), Supreet Kaur (“Kaur”), David Jeong (“Jeong”), and Theron Young (“Young”), collectively (“LVMPD Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record, Craig R. Anderson, Esq. and Jackie V. Nichols, Esq., of Marquis Aurbach, hereby agree and jointly stipulate the following:

1. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15, the Represented Plaintiffs and LVMPD Defendants agree to the filing of the Second Amended Complaint as proposed to the Motion for Leave to Amend. See ECF No. 82.

2. The Represented Parties and LVMPD Defendants agree that an Answer or Motion to Dismiss shall be due 21 days from the filing of the Second Amended Complaint.

3. The instant stipulation is being made in good faith and not for purposes of delay and that no party waives any arguments by entering into this stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above Stipulation (ECF No. 87) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (ECF No. 82) is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

Semper v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 23, 2022
2:20-cv-01875-JCM-EJY (D. Nev. Aug. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Semper v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP SEMPER, an individual; COREY JOHNSON, an individual; ASHLEY…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 23, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-01875-JCM-EJY (D. Nev. Aug. 23, 2022)