From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Semones v. Thompson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 29, 2022
2:21-cv-01943 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01943 KJM DB P

11-29-2022

TIMOTHY DAVID SEMONES, Petitioner, v. PAUL THOMPSON, et al., Respondent.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

DEBOFAH BARNES UNTIED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 25, 2022, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition as lacking merit and failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (ECF No. 7.) Petitioner has not filed an opposition, a statement of non-opposition to the motion to dismiss, or sought additional time to file a response to the motion. Local Rule 230(1) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion....”

Accordingly, the court will direct petitioner to show cause in writing why the motion to dismiss should not be granted. Petitioner is advised that failure to file a response to the motion to dismiss may result in a recommendation that the motion be granted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty (20) days of the date of service of this order petitioner shall either file and serve an opposition to the motion to dismiss or show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders.

ORDER


Summaries of

Semones v. Thompson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 29, 2022
2:21-cv-01943 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Semones v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY DAVID SEMONES, Petitioner, v. PAUL THOMPSON, et al., Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 29, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-01943 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2022)