From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Semler v. Finch

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 28, 2009
333 F. App'x 156 (8th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-1189.

Submitted: September 21, 2009.

Filed: September 28, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Raymond L. Semler Moose Lake, MN, pro se.

Marsha Eldot Devine, Attorney General's Office, St. Paul, MN, for Appellee.

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


Raymond L. Semler appeals the district court's dismissal of his lawsuit raising 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state-law claims. Upon de novo review, see Allen v. Purkett, 5 F.3d 1151, 1153 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that dismissal was proper because Semler's claims were barred by res judicata. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.


Summaries of

Semler v. Finch

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 28, 2009
333 F. App'x 156 (8th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Semler v. Finch

Case Details

Full title:Raymond L. SEMLER, Appellant v. Donna FINCH, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Sep 28, 2009

Citations

333 F. App'x 156 (8th Cir. 2009)