Selmon v. State

Full title: HARRY G. SELMON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 22, 1967

195 So. 2d 249 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

Opinion

No. 7349.

February 22, 1967.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pinellas County; Joseph P. McNulty, Judge.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, Carleton L. Weidemeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under the authority of Dancy v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 175 So.2d 208; Clark v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 174 So.2d 773; Byers v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 163 So.2d 57; Duncan v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 161 So.2d 718; Taylor v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 171 So.2d 402, and Anderson v. State, Fla. App. 1964, 164 So.2d 887.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

ALLEN, C.J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.