From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SELLERS v. LEIGH, CAFÉ DIVA

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 27, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0496 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0496 LKK GGH PS.

June 27, 2007


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed March 30, 2007, plaintiff was ordered to submit the appropriate filing fee or a completed application and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis within twenty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

SELLERS v. LEIGH, CAFÉ DIVA

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 27, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0496 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2007)
Case details for

SELLERS v. LEIGH, CAFÉ DIVA

Case Details

Full title:JAY L. SELLERS, Plaintiff, v. LEIGH, THE CAFÉ DIVA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 27, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0496 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2007)