From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sellers v. Anstett

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Oct 13, 2020
304 So. 3d 821 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D19-4600

10-13-2020

James M. SELLERS, N.P., Timothy P. Nichols, M.D., and Emerald Coast Urgent Care, L.L.C., Petitioners, v. Madison ANSTETT, Respondent.

Joseph E. Brooks, Olivia Brooks, and Jami M. Kimbrell, Brooks Law, Tallahassee, for Petitioners. M. Kevin Hausfeld, Kevin Hausfeld, P.A., Pensacola, for Respondent.


Joseph E. Brooks, Olivia Brooks, and Jami M. Kimbrell, Brooks Law, Tallahassee, for Petitioners.

M. Kevin Hausfeld, Kevin Hausfeld, P.A., Pensacola, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED . See Williams v. Oken , 62 So. 3d 1129, 1137 (Fla. 2011) (stating that proper remedy is for district court of appeal to dismiss certiorari petition and "remand[ ] the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing" on qualifications of expert).

Ray, C.J., and Makar and Jay, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sellers v. Anstett

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Oct 13, 2020
304 So. 3d 821 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Sellers v. Anstett

Case Details

Full title:JAMES M. SELLERS, N.P., TIMOTHY P. NICHOLS, M.D., and EMERALD COAST URGENT…

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Oct 13, 2020

Citations

304 So. 3d 821 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Citing Cases

Univ. of Fla. Bd. of Trs. v. Carmody

Conversely, the Court held that a petition should have been dismissed where the defendant received proper…