From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Selleck v. Higby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

May, 1928.


Order denying motion for judgment, and order denying motion for reargument, reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motions granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff to plead over within ten days upon payment of said costs. If plaintiff intends to claim a conversion of his property by defendant, he should allege defendant's knowledge of plaintiff's ownership. The entire complaint is so carelessly and inaccurately drawn, as well as so misleading in its allegations of dates, that the nature of the cause of action is the subject of speculation. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Selleck v. Higby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Selleck v. Higby

Case Details

Full title:G. HAROLD SELLECK, Respondent, v. EVERETT HIGBY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1928

Citations

224 App. Div. 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)