Selfridge v. Morrison Cafeteria Company

4 Citing cases

  1. L.C.P. Chemicals v. Strickland

    472 S.E.2d 471 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 4 times
    Reversing superior court because it was not authorized to draw inferences different than those drawn by ALJ/Board regarding claimant's diligence in job search

    Ero Indus. v. Phillips, 207 Ga. App. 432, 433 (1) ( 428 S.E.2d 396) (1993). See also Selfridge v. Morrison Cafeteria Co., 192 Ga. App. 469, 470 (1) ( 385 S.E.2d 137) (1989). The record contains some evidence supporting the ALJ's finding that Strickland's testimony regarding his job search was not credible. Strickland did testify that he searched for employment since his injury, and he submitted a "record of work search" listing the inquiries he made in search of work between the date of the plant closing, February 2, 1994, through June 2, 1994.

  2. Horne v. Exum

    419 S.E.2d 147 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 8 times
    Setting forth essential elements of equitable estoppel

    The superior court is authorized to reverse an award of the Full Board only when there is plain error of fact or an error purely of law. (Cit.)' [Cit.]" Selfridge v. Morrison Cafeteria Co., 192 Ga. App. 469, 470 (1) ( 385 S.E.2d 137) (1989). It cannot be extrapolated from the fact that Horne made voluntary payments to Exum after the injury that he voluntarily elected to bring himself under the broad provisions of the Act under the theory of equitable estoppel or any other theory.

  3. Conwood Corp. v. Guinn

    410 S.E.2d 315 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 1 times

    '"' [Cit.]" Selfridge v. Morrison Cafeteria Co., 192 Ga. App. 469 (1), 470 ( 385 S.E.2d 137) (1989). Considering claimant's testimony as to the amount of time he spent in both states, the maintenance of his home office and the paperwork which he conducted from his home, we cannot conclude that the ALJ's determination that Georgia was the principal locality of the employment relationship was erroneous.

  4. Lee v. Middleton Logging Co.

    402 S.E.2d 536 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 1 times

    The employee's conduct in not arriving at the job site until 2:00 p. m. demonstrates that he only went to the job site for personal non-work-related reasons, therefore, his injury did not arise out of or during the course of his employment." "A finding of fact by . . . the Full Board, `when supported by any evidence, (is) conclusive and binding. [Cit.] The superior court is not authorized to substitute its judgment for that of the Full Board. [Cit.] The superior court is authorized to reverse an award of the Full Board only when there is plain error of fact or an error purely of law. [Cit.]'" Selfridge v. Morrison Cafeteria Co., 192 Ga. App. 469 (1) ( 385 S.E.2d 137) (1989). After a review of the entire record, we determine that there is ample evidence to support the full board's factual findings.