From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Self v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 13, 1933
66 S.W.2d 316 (Tex. Crim. App. 1933)

Opinion

No. 16301.

Delivered December 13, 1933.

1. — Bills of Exception — Statement of Facts.

Nothing is presented for review by record containing neither bills of exception nor statement of facts.

2. — Intoxicating Liquor — Sentence Reformed.

Where defendant has been convicted of transporting intoxicating liquor and sentence recites that defendant has been convicted of transporting liquor, it is reformed to show that defendant has been convicted of transporting intoxicating liquor.

Appeal from the District Court of Van Zandt County. Tried below before the Hon. Thos. R. Bond, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for transporting intoxicating liquor; penalty, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Affirmed.

The opinion states the case.

Earl M. Greer, of Wills Point, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


The offense is transporting intoxicating liquor; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The sentence recites that appellant has been convicted of transporting liquor. In order that the sentence may follow the verdict of the jury and judgment of conviction, it is reformed to show that appellant has been convicted of transporting intoxicating liquor.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment reformed and affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.


Summaries of

Self v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 13, 1933
66 S.W.2d 316 (Tex. Crim. App. 1933)
Case details for

Self v. State

Case Details

Full title:C. SELF v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Dec 13, 1933

Citations

66 S.W.2d 316 (Tex. Crim. App. 1933)
66 S.W.2d 316