From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seletsky v. St. Francis Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1999
263 A.D.2d 452 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted June 23, 1999

July 6, 1999

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), dated August 3, 1998, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the complaint for failure to file a note of issue.

Bartlett, McDonough, Bastone Monaghan, LLP, White Plains, N Y (Edward J. Guardaro, Jr., of counsel), for appellants.

GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., FRED T. SANTUCCI, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

On January 26, 1998, the Supreme Court issued an order stating, inter alia, that counsel for the plaintiffs and the defendants certified that all discovery and pretrial motions were complete. The Supreme Court sua sponte directed the plaintiffs to serve and file a note of issue within 90 days. Moreover, the order stated that failure to comply within 90 days might serve as a basis for dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3216. The order constituted a valid 90-day notice pursuant to CPLR 3216 ( see, Safina v. Queens-Long Is. Med. Group, 238 A.D.2d 395; Longacre Corp. v. Better Hosp. Equip. Corp., 228 A.D.2d 653). The plaintiffs failed to comply with the 90-day notice either by timely filing a note of issue or moving for an extension of time within which to comply pursuant to CPLR 2004 ( see, Papadopoulas v. R.B. Supply Corp., 152 A.D.2d 552). The plaintiffs did not demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their noncompliance and a meritorious cause of action ( see, CPLR 3216[e]). Therefore, the motion is granted.


Summaries of

Seletsky v. St. Francis Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1999
263 A.D.2d 452 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Seletsky v. St. Francis Hospital

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD SELETSKY, et al., respondents, v. ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1999

Citations

263 A.D.2d 452 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
692 N.Y.S.2d 708

Citing Cases

Werbin v. Locicero

Under these circumstances, the certification order had the same effect as a duly served 90-day notice (see,…

Vento v. Bargain Bilge West, Inc.

ORDERED that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondent Bargain Bilge West,…