From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Selden v. Sleet

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Apr 2, 2018
Case No: 2:18-cv-120-FtM-38CM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 2, 2018)

Opinion

Case No: 2:18-cv-120-FtM-38CM

04-02-2018

GLENN LEE SELDEN, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL A SLEET, JULIE L. JONES, PAMELA BONDI, WILLIAM J. ALEXANDER and ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court. --------

Plaintiff Glenn Lee Selden initiated this action by filing a "Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Prisoner Complaint)" (Doc. 1, "Complaint"). The Complaint, which is 63 pages in length, with an additional 190 pages of exhibits attached (Docs. 1-1 through 1-8), references numerous federal statutes and international laws and is wholly incomprehensible. It is comprised of various pages of the complaint form, unrelated correspondence, drawings, excerpts from articles or books, and notices and court orders from previous state and federal cases filed by Plaintiff. The Court has attempted, but cannot discern what, if any, claim Plaintiff is attempting to articulate or what relief he seeks. Plaintiff accompanied the filing of his Complaint with a request to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2). Because Plaintiff is a three-strike litigant, the Court will dismiss the Complaint to Plaintiff re-filing the complaint in a new action accompanied by the requisite $400 filing fee.

In pertinent part, The Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) contains the following subsection:

In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claims upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court takes judicial notice of the following filings brought by Plaintiff in a federal court that qualify as a dismissal under § 1915(g):
• Selden v. Federal Agent Brian Watson, et al., Case No. 6:09-cv-1834-18DAB, (M.D. Fla. Oct, 4, 2009) (finding action "lacks an arguable basis in law" and dismissing complaint "as frivolous");
• Selden v. Murray, Case No. 8:09-cv-2207-JDW-AEP (M.D. Fla. Nov. 5, 2009) (dismissing complaint "for failure to state a claim");
Selden v. Correctional Medical Authority, et al., Case No. 4:10-cv-143-RH/WCS, 2010 WL 3385254 *1 (N.D. Fla. August 25, 2010) (accepting report and recommendation finding complaint entirely fanciful and dismissing it pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B));
• Selden v. United States, CIA, et al., Case no. 11-00621 LEK/KSC (D. Hawaii Oct. 19, 2011) (finding complaint "completely frivolous and unconnected with reality" and dismissing it pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b) & 1915(g)).

Because Plaintiff is currently incarcerated, has had three or more qualifying dismissals, and is not under imminent danger of serious physical injury, this action will be dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new civil rights complaint form and paying the full $400 filing fee at the time the complaint is filed.

ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate any pending motions, close this case, and enter judgment accordingly.

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 2nd day of April, 2018.

/s/ _________

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SA: FTMP-1
Copies: All Parties of Record


Summaries of

Selden v. Sleet

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Apr 2, 2018
Case No: 2:18-cv-120-FtM-38CM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 2, 2018)
Case details for

Selden v. Sleet

Case Details

Full title:GLENN LEE SELDEN, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL A SLEET, JULIE L. JONES, PAMELA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Apr 2, 2018

Citations

Case No: 2:18-cv-120-FtM-38CM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 2, 2018)